<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-poll-28</link>
	<description>part of the Wood Talk Online community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting ready to try my first dovetails.  I don&#039;t think that they are a necessary part of great design or workmanship, but I do want to learn how for my own S &amp; G&#039;s.  I think simple is usually the best way to go.  But, that is mostly because I&#039;m not a huge fan of the ornate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting ready to try my first dovetails.  I don&#8217;t think that they are a necessary part of great design or workmanship, but I do want to learn how for my own S &amp; G&#8217;s.  I think simple is usually the best way to go.  But, that is mostly because I&#8217;m not a huge fan of the ornate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mulcahy</title>
		<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mulcahy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Dovetails=craftsman......maybe,but I would consider a craftsman as a conscience effort of design choice,wood selection,proper cutting and milling,assembly, and fit and finish. Yes, I&#039;m one of those with a router and jig....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dovetails=craftsman&#8230;&#8230;maybe,but I would consider a craftsman as a conscience effort of design choice,wood selection,proper cutting and milling,assembly, and fit and finish. Yes, I&#8217;m one of those with a router and jig&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>I like to use dovetails as a desigh feture but, do not yet have the skill to do hand cut ones. So I rely on the router/jig to get the effect that I want. I feel that it is a mark of craftmanship to use dovetails but, not nessary for strength of joints with todays glues and other methods of jointery.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to use dovetails as a desigh feture but, do not yet have the skill to do hand cut ones. So I rely on the router/jig to get the effect that I want. I feel that it is a mark of craftmanship to use dovetails but, not nessary for strength of joints with todays glues and other methods of jointery.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>James -

An excellent point.  Unfortunately, a lot of emphasis is placed on the &#039;perfection&#039; of one part of the piece.  If the DT&#039;s look great, but the piece looks like crap, it&#039;s not a success.

Also, I think it&#039;s kinda sad that the equation of:

Dovetails = Craftsmanship

makes people think that without DT&#039;s, the piece is not a good one.

Alas, like it or not, that&#039;s something the customers want... so, that&#039;s today&#039;s poll...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James -</p>
<p>An excellent point.  Unfortunately, a lot of emphasis is placed on the &#8216;perfection&#8217; of one part of the piece.  If the DT&#8217;s look great, but the piece looks like crap, it&#8217;s not a success.</p>
<p>Also, I think it&#8217;s kinda sad that the equation of:</p>
<p>Dovetails = Craftsmanship</p>
<p>makes people think that without DT&#8217;s, the piece is not a good one.</p>
<p>Alas, like it or not, that&#8217;s something the customers want&#8230; so, that&#8217;s today&#8217;s poll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cottonwood</title>
		<link>http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cottonwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsworkbench.com/2008/07/13/quick-poll-28/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Interesting that dovetails are the &quot;mark of craftsmanship.&quot;  I think you&#039;re better off looking at the piece as a whole and making *it* look good.  Spend some time looking at masterpieces -- the dovetails weren&#039;t perfect, but the proportions of the overall work is.  I see too much furniture with perfect dovetails that is, sorry to say, ugly from across the room.   I wonder at what point the shift of focus moved.  Post industrial revolution where the skill was placed in the machine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that dovetails are the &#8220;mark of craftsmanship.&#8221;  I think you&#8217;re better off looking at the piece as a whole and making *it* look good.  Spend some time looking at masterpieces &#8212; the dovetails weren&#8217;t perfect, but the proportions of the overall work is.  I see too much furniture with perfect dovetails that is, sorry to say, ugly from across the room.   I wonder at what point the shift of focus moved.  Post industrial revolution where the skill was placed in the machine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

